[wilhelmtux-discussion] Open Source Licensing..
claude.almansi at bluewin.ch
Don Feb 13 19:53:09 CET 2003
The question came up at the Copyright o Copyleft seminar in Bellinzona
last year (1) as a very intricate one - and Professor Cottier, who
teaches at the Institut Suisse de Droit Comparé in Lausanne and at the
Università della Svizzera Italiana, confirmed it in an e-mail.
The funny thing with the Swiss law on author's right is that it says
http://www.admin.ch/ch/d/sr/231_1/a17.html ) that if someone creates a
software while working for an employer, the intellectual property is the
employer's - contrary to the principle of "droit imprescriptible" that
applies to other creations.
For the whole law on authors' rights, see
http://www.admin.ch/ch/d/sr/231_1/index.html - but then it doesn't deal
For the law on industrial property, the Lisbon convention applies to CH
too: http://www.admin.ch/ch/f/rs/0_232_03/index.html or
http://www.admin.ch/ch/d/sr/0_232_03/index.html (damned unreadable with
no subtitles for each article, sorry)
(1) http://www.comunic-azione.ch/weblaw/diavolo/copyright.htm sorry for
self-quoting: not a single bloody local journalist attended the
seminar, 'cause they thought it was too technical - otherwise I'd quote
THEM - however, the speakers checked my text before it went online so it
shouldn't have too many mistakes.
De : wilhelmtux-discussion-bounces at wilhelmtux.ch
[mailto:wilhelmtux-discussion-bounces at wilhelmtux.ch] De la part de
Envoyé : jeudi 13 février 2003 17:48
À : wilhelmtux-discussion
Objet : Re: [wilhelmtux-discussion] Open Source Licensing..
On Thu, 2003-02-13 at 16:44, Robert Ribnitz wrote:
it is indeed an interesting read, especially the fact that 'to license'
means 'to allow someone do something', but only as long as you (the
licensing party) please - licenses are not contracts (IANAL :).
does anybody here know how the legal situation in switzerland is exactly
concerning this matter?